Search This Blog

10.19.2011

Life as a Story

After watching the episode in class today, I was fascinated by Buffy saying, “Stop telling stories. Life isn’t a story.” This quote seems to both support and run contrary to what we’ve discussed about novels and real life in Northanger Abbey. In the beginning of the novel, Catherine Morland views her life as though it were a gothic romance, and expects to see ghosts and haunted mirrors behind every door. Thus, when she visits Northanger Abbey, she takes Henry’s teasing as fact and tries to bring to light the terrible murder she has imagined in her head. After her confrontation with Henry, Catherine experiences severe disillusionment when she realizes that real life is not, in fact, like a novel. This encounter would support Buffy’s claim that life can’t be summed up by stories. Furthermore, we see how Andrew avoids facing the truth of his crime by telling himself stories to cover up the fact that he murdered his friend. He uses stories as a way of glossing over the hard edges of reality, and these stories become a fictional world that he can hide in. Similarly, Andrew uses stories to romanticize Buffy and the apocalypse that she must prevent.

However, the very fact that Joss Whedon presents this quote to us through a character in a TV series would suggest that, in a way, life is a story. Each person’s perception of life is shaped by past experiences and emotions. Thus, no human perception can be without bias. Memories are stories that we tell ourselves over and over in order to relive past events. We learn about people and real life situations through how we experience them in our heads, on screen, or in novels. As we discussed in class, Jane Austen uses Northanger Abbey to teach us about life through the medium of a novel. She demonstrates, through the experiences of Catherine, that novels have a purpose for instruction and gaining knowledge about real life. Girls with overactive imaginations, like Catherine, learn about the costs of applying fantasy to real life situations through Catherine’s mistake. As Catherine learns how to behave in society, so do we as the readers. In this way, Austen herself seems to argue that life is a story, and telling stories is a real way to learn about life. Similarly, Joss Whedon presents Buffy as a story about a vampire slayer who deals with average real-life issues such as high school, friends, roommates, and feeling inadequate. Even while Andrew narrates his movie about Buffy, he seems to impart some knowledge to the reader. He says, “She's like a woman fighting for more than life. She fights like fighting is her life. It's like the air she breathes, and she knows she will win because there is no alternative.” It sounds kind of corny, but also contains some truth. Buffy has to believe in herself because if she doesn’t the world will, quite literally, end. I think the reason we still read novels or watch movies is because we do realize that in many ways life is a story, and through stories we can learn some essential truths about life.

6 comments:

  1. Katherine, great points! I love your idea that presenting the quote that "life is not a story," in the form of a scripted television episode is self-consciously ironic. To continue, your move of connecting Jane Austen's editorial voice to Whedon's and the idea of literature and "stories" as a force for change and possibly the redemption Andrew seeks is very insightful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with both you, and Sydney. I don't know who said it in class, but there's that quote about how everyone thinks they're the herione of their own life. We relate to each other through the stories we tell each other about ourselves. None of it is the absolute "truth," but that doesn't make it less important.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That was me actually, if we're thinking about the same quote. It's from "The Holiday." Iris says, "You're supposed to be the leading lady of your own life, for god's sake!" I think I substituted heroine for leading lady when I said it in class, but it's a similar idea. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. You make a lot of great points in your post. You're correct in that there is no such thing as an "objective" story or history. Even if it's subconscious, people always insert some sort of bias or agenda into their stories and histories. Andrew is the perfect example of this with his attempts, poor as they are, to paint the story of his past actions in a better, more understandable light. Ultimately, he needs Buffy, the hard core realist, to open his eyes to the value of accepting the truth. However, given that we see this in a TV show, Whedon clearly means to tell his viewer that life, even looked at realistically, is ultimately a story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love the way Eryn has referred to Buffy as the hard core realist. It's ironic because in this episode, and indeed all of season 7 particularly, Buffy has to play the realist to keep everyone else on track. But if we take a step back and look at Buffy as a vampire slayer endowed with superhuman strength, reflexes, and insight, she doesn't seem to be the most likely character to play the down-to-earth realist.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm really glad that you posted about this, since it was something that really stood out to me too. I was interested in a slightly different side of the same broad concept, but a greater focus on the role of the narrator in the script of life than the characters. This episode, in particular Andrew's role in this episode, shows the vulnerability of a tale based on the person involved. This reminded me of how powerful the role of the narrator is, because they are in control of what goes into the story and what stays out, kind of like a puppeteer. In this episode, Andrew completely changes his version of killing Jonathan, because he was given a different way to look at it. Although it was done to the extreme in this case, it goes back to part of our discussion on Dracula. Initially we wondered who the narrator was or who was responsible for putting the different writings together and later we wondered why Dracula's voice wasn't heard and why that might be. We don't know what part of the tale wasn't told, because we only have first hand accounts, but edited to fit together by an individual. A similar theme is seen in Northanger Abbey because Austen makes the presence of the narrator so strong. Austen's role as the narrator helps guide the reader, but in a way that controls how we react to certain characters and situations. She informs us what we should be thinking in each situation and our opinions on all of the characters. This reminds the reader/viewer, that every story must be taken with a grain of salt and the idea that there might be a certain point of view or exaggeration designed to manipulate the reader.

    ReplyDelete