Buffy and the scoobies laugh at the tiny demon at the end of "Fear, Itself". Still, he terrorizes them throughout the entire episode, despite his size. His powers are greater than those of anyone else in the episode, and Buffy's size advantage over him is the only way he can be defeated in the end. In Otranto, the giant certainly uses his size to his advantage in killing Manfred's heir to the throne and in making an impressive entrance, but when Alfonso was a human and thus average human size (we assume) his line ended and the kingdom was taken over by Manfred's ancestors. A reader or viewer can draw from this that size does make a difference, because in smaller forms villains are more vulnerable. Another example from our texts that supports this, I believe, is Transformations. The dwarf, who is significantly smaller than an average man, is able to win over Guido's lover in Guido's larger form.
But there is at least one instance we've come across so far that I think breaks this mold: Hyde. He is described as smaller than Jekyll, but is far more evil. The image of him as a short, gnarled, stunted man is chilling and makes him seem even more realistic... and as such even terrifying. In the two film interpretations we saw of Hyde, he was a large muscular beast. This image, while perhaps more effective in Hollywood, does not chill and disturb in the same way as the original description. So, while in larger film form Hyde might be capable of more physical damage, in the story he is more effective as a villain and more capable than his larger-than-life counterparts.
This is a really unique comparison Kim. It might be interesting to consider the villain in The Turn of The Screw as well. In my mind, it's the governess's insanity, which is manifested as the ghosts. Being that the are supernatural and not really a physical presence, do they have size at all? And does that make them/her craziness even more terrifying?
ReplyDeleteI really like the topic you chose for your post. I think the size of a monster is a very interesting topic in comparison to how scary they are. Does bigger always mean scarier? Like you pointed out, obviously not, because the little demon caused a lot of chaos in the frat house. However, you have a good point that size causes many different types of vulnerabilities. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI thought this analysis was kind of brilliant. I didn't think about it at all, even though the whole size thing is staring right in our faces in the episode (and Otranto). Going along with what Madison said though... we have, in The Nutcracker, a very interesting thing going on with size. The small mouse can only be overcome by the similar sized nutcracker—I'd imagine Maria is larger... but everything in that story seems quite interchangeable...
ReplyDelete